It is thus on the site "no pasaran" that you judge the foreign policy of France and Europe! I remind you that it is about a site which practises the french bashing and that its analyses have the quality of articles of "Gala".
Are you proud to be not intellectual?

" Objectivize truths "? If it is about a joke, I indeed want to laugh with you but to speak about the objective truths stemming from a website the prejudice of which is notorious, seems to me completely inappropriate.
Besides, "we already know that" has no value as for the "scientific" quality of the website and remains to demonstrate.

All right, I understood well.

I did not effectively read your post because I still have no time to dedicate me to this blog. But what I wanted to stigmatize, it is the discriminatory insult toward French which often returns associating " French " and " surrender ". All their History shows that this association is an unbearable lie. For the rest, we are in démocraty and I recognize you completely the right to think of what you want of the policy of the President Sarkozy and Mr Kouchner.

Come to say this kind of stupidity to the families of 10 French soldiers died in the fight in Afghanistan. But you are certainly too cowardly.

What's the use to give you their addresses, you would have no courage to come in France to meet them.
But because you are interested in the history of France, I am going to give you some information which you ignore:
1 million 500 000 French soldiers died in the fight from 1914 till 1918,
240 000 French soldiers and Resistance fighters died in the fight from 1939 till 1945.

Ah, I forgot. Here are some moments of history which you seem not to know. " France makes a commitment in the American war for independence at first by the supply of equipment and helps in favour of the insurgents, then officially in 1778. The naval and ground French help and the support of his allies contributed to the American victory, notably to the Battle of Yorktown, and ends in the treaty of Versailles of 1783. " Do not forget that without us, the british flag would still float on your towns.

It seems that you want to explain to me that States act according to their interests. It is an evidence. France intervened in favour of the future United States to weaken England but not only. It is evident that numerous French people saw in the American revolution an inspiration to reform their country. 1789 was close.
In the same way, the interest of the United States during the second world war was to destroy Nazi Germany.Their objective thus was to invade Germany and for it, to pass by France because it was on the road which they had chosen. However, I think that certain Americans were not insensible in the fact that in the passage, they contributed to the liberation of an allied country.
Finally, you speak to me about the war of Secession and about the mexican adventure of Napoleon III. Of course, in the History, there were unfriendly actions of France towards the United States as there was unfriendly actions of the United States towards France (the ostracism of Roosevelt towards de Gaulle and towards free France for example). But note, all the same, that France and the United States were never at war the one against the other one.

As regards the French soldiers, they die for their Homeland. I hope that it's the same for the American soldiers whatever is the place where they die.

Some lessons are still necessary for you, little Jojo.

The soldiers of all the nations die for their homeland, that is for the country the citizens of which they are. It doesn't much matter the place where they die. As a consequence, the American soldiers died for their country during both world wars because the United States thought that their interest was to destroy nazi Germany. That they cross for it by France, Italy or Great Britain changes nothing this reality.