|
< Previous Post | Next Post >
Tuesday, November 4. 2008Five Reasons Obama would not be Elected in EuropePosted by Kyle Atwell in Transatlantic Relations, US Domestic and Cultural Issues on Tuesday, November 4. 2008
Denis Boyles argues in the National Review that while the vast majority of Europeans are hoping Obama will be elected President of the United States today, he would not have a chance of success were he running to lead any European country. Boyles offers five reasons why:
1. “His tax policies are frightening,” in that they are too far left for Europe. 2. “His views on abortion are way too extreme for Europeans.” 3. “His lack of experience means trouble.” 4. “He’s in love with failed ideas.” Boyles calls Obama a “socialist romantic”, compares his policies to the EU Constitution, and then argues that the dream of Obama and all liberals is to have kids raised by the state – the first argument makes no sense and the second argument is simply not true. 5. “His name, incidentally, is Barack Hussein Obama. Sorry to save this for last, but the sad fact is a politician with Obama’s racial and ethnic background wouldn’t stand a chance in the U.K., France, Germany, Italy, or anywhere else in the European Union no matter how charming his speeches were.” Based on my experience living in Brussels this year, I definitely agree with point five, at least for Belgium – however, Belgium also ranks as one of the most xenophobic and racist countries in the West based on several reports, including one discussed at Portfolio.com. Nonetheless, it is unlikely there will be any European heads of state from an ethnic minority in the near future, unless you believe Turkey is a European country. A breakdown of the number of minority lawmakers there are in Britain, France and Germany is provided by MSNBC (HT: David):
French National Assembly: 1 of 577 seats British Parliament: 15 of 646 seats German Bundestag: 10 of 612 seats Does Boyle overstate Obama’s socialist leaning by arguing that Obama’s economic policies would be too far left for most European countries? While Obama’s tax plan will lead the United States to have one of the highest top marginal tax rates of industrialized nations (according to the conservative Heritage Foundation), his plan also aims to decrease taxes for the majority of Americans (80% is the number Obama cites). Raising taxes on the richest is hardly a radical idea in American politics, but rather a standard center-left Democrat platform. According to recent Gallup polls, 58% of Americans say wealth should be more evenly distributed in America, and 46% say the government should redistribute wealth by “heavy taxes on the rich”; 75% of Democrats agree the government should redistribute wealth through “heavy taxes on the rich”. If Obama is a radical socialist, then it would appear that half of America is as well. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Marie Claude
- #1 - 2008-11-04 19:45 - (Reply)
5- we are not too far to vote for an Obama, we got already a few magrebin ministers, and they are more french than the french socio-democrates Comments ()
Pat Patterson
- #1.1 - 2008-11-05 04:00 - (Reply)
If Obama had run as a Republican in the 13th State Senate District of Illinois not only would he not have won but he wouldn't even have a been a trivia question. That district is 66% black, the poverty rate is 18% and it probably hasn't elected a Republican since the Civil War. So blaming the "elephants" seems misplaced. He picked the only route to political success and that was through the Daley machine and racial politics. Comments ()
David
- #1.1.1 - 2008-11-05 05:18 - (Reply)
Pat, tonight is a massive repudiation of your hero and your party. The Republican Party is now just a regional party of undereducated white resentment. You need to really do some rethinking. Comments ()
Pat Patterson
- #1.1.1.1 - 2008-11-05 12:10 - (Reply)
That's probably been burning in your soul for months and the best you can come up with is "massive repudiation." I'm not sure what exactly you are referring to but I was responding to Marie Claude in regards to "elephants" but I do like the comment about undereducated which basically signals to me that the Democrats have simply given up on being a populist party anytime in the near and far future. Comments ()
Tom
- #1.1.1.2 - 2008-11-11 23:06 - (Reply)
The best argument the left can come up with is insults. Always insults, hatred, racism, and bigotry. Never any substance. Take your undereducated whites comment. It's clear that white people who have no education deserve no representation in you mind, and have no need for protection under a government ruled by your ideology. Whites who don't agree with you are the constant subject of bigotry and abuse such as this, which reinforces and strengthens their beliefs. Comments ()
Marie Claude
- #1.1.2 - 2008-11-05 13:02 - (Reply)
for Obama you have to consider Alinsky and Bill Ayers organisations, while our elephants are in both main parties, the conservatives and socialists, they design their candidate, except for Segolene who started her campain earlier as an outsider, but she was doomed by the pink elephants at the end, difficult to reach the presidency goal when you don't follow the rules of a party Comments ()
Don S
- #2 - 2008-11-04 21:34 - (Reply)
Boyles overstates his case. Point 1 is simply not true for Europe, point 2 is true in some parts of Europe and not of others. Comments ()
Zyme
- #3 - 2008-11-05 00:19 - (Reply)
There might be another reason why minority representation in our political class is no issue for the electorate here in contrast to America. It has to do with the amount of trust in the political class. Comments ()
David
- #4 - 2008-11-05 05:13 - (Reply)
Barack Obama will be the 44th president of the United States. Congratulations to American people for rejecting fear and division and embracing change and inclusion. Tonight we have reaffirmed our basic principles. Comments ()
Zyme
- #4.1 - 2008-11-05 08:06 - (Reply)
It will be very interesting to witness the developments when a person operating with such an amount of symbolism and emotions will meet the pragmatic technocrats in Brussels or Beijing. Comments ()
Kevin Sampson
- #4.1.1 - 2008-11-05 14:34 - (Reply)
Wait till he runs into Vlad Putin. 'Bambi Meets Godzilla' comes to mind. Comments ()
Pamela
- #4.1.2 - 2008-11-08 10:24 - (Reply)
Well, Zyme, it didn't take long. Watching him Thursday afternoon at his press conference was painful. He looks like unmitigated hell. It hasn't even been a week and already I'm feeling sorry for the schmuck. Comments ()
Zyme
- #4.1.2.1 - 2008-11-08 11:40 - (Reply)
Is he now going to attend the G20 summit on the world economy in Washington on Nov 15th? Comments ()
John in Michigan, USA
- #4.1.2.2 - 2008-11-08 11:42 - (Reply)
Nah, unmitigated hell is way over the top. He looked tired and perhaps a bit hung over, he had a slight rough start, but he warmed to it reasonably well, at least in the 19 minutes that I watched. Comments ()
katie
- #4.1.2.2.1 - 2008-11-08 17:08 - (Reply)
if he is going to make a joke he should know what he is talking about. it was Hillary that said she talked to dead people. Obama was on the phone saying sorry to nancy reag Comments ()
John in Michigan, USA
- #4.1.2.3 - 2008-11-08 11:45 - (Reply)
And of course, Obama's worst moment in his first presser (press conference) beats a typical moment from a typical Bush presser. Comments ()
Joe Noory
- #4.2 - 2008-11-11 16:27 - (Reply)
Having spent the day on Friday at the Stasi Museum, I can actually wrap my brain around your statement - because it's just as chillingly misguided to assume that some sort of singular man, political party, or world view will somehow redeem the feelings of the adherents and those they force it upon. The tome of your "statement of faith" in an ideology, as opposed to promoting a line of policy has a ring to it no different than the banners humg by DDR authorities: the impression of the meaning is not the same as the actual concepts presented, not the actual policy concepts. Comments ()
katie
- #5 - 2008-11-05 10:21 - (Reply)
michael moore did say americans are the dumbest people in the world. Comments ()
quo vadis
- #6 - 2008-11-05 11:14 - (Reply)
What, is the honeymoon over already? Oh my, those stupid amis have screwed up again. It seems we're just not sophisticated enough to produce a leader with the qualities of a Putin. Comments ()
John in Michigan, USA
- #7 - 2008-11-06 00:36 - (Reply)
Obama has made history. He is now my President. Comments ()
|
Contact UsEmail Joerg Wolf and Kyle Atwell at:
ar-team AT atlanticreview.org We are available for interviews, and appreciate feedback and suggestions. Subscribe and FollowWelcome!
You are reading the ATLANTIC REVIEW, a Press Digest on Transatlantic Relations combined with commentary and analysis. More about us. Follow Atlantic Review on Facebook or on Twitter. Subscribe to one of our RSS-Feeds or to our newsletter. SponsorSUPPORT THIS SITEBlogrollHot TopicsClick on one of the following links to see all Atlantic Review posts about this topic in a chronological order with the latest post on top:
Afghanistan Anti-Americanism Economics Iran Iraq Merkel Polls Terrorism Click here for the full list of all topics. |
Home - About Us - Newsletter - Transatlantic Relations - US Foreign Policy - Various RSS Feeds Designed for Atlantic Review by Carl.

