<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/templates/default/atom.css" type="text/css" ?>

<feed 
   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
    <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/feeds/atom.xml" rel="self" title="Atlantic Review" type="application/atom+xml" />
    <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/"                        rel="alternate"    title="Atlantic Review" type="text/html" />
    <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=2.0"     rel="alternate"    title="Atlantic Review" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title type="html">Atlantic Review</title>
    <subtitle type="html">A press digest on transatlantic affairs edited by three German Fulbright Alumni</subtitle>
    <icon>http://www.atlanticreview.org/templates/default/img/s9y_banner_small.png</icon>
    <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/</id>
    <updated>2010-09-09T17:20:27Z</updated>
    <generator uri="http://www.s9y.org/" version="1.5.1">Serendipity 1.5.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1413-Are-We-Missing-the-Big-Stories.html" rel="alternate" title="Are We Missing the Big Stories?" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-09-09T17:20:25Z</published>
        <updated>2010-09-09T17:20:27Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1413</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1413</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/3-Transatlantic-Relations" label="Transatlantic Relations" term="Transatlantic Relations" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1413-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Are We Missing the Big Stories?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">James Joyner asks on the Atlantic Council's website: <strong>"</strong></font><a href="http://www.acus.org/new_atlanticist/nato-fat-bloated-job-creation-project"><strong><font face="Verdana">NATO: A Fat, Bloated, Job Creation Project?</font></strong></a><font face="Verdana"><strong>"</strong> </font></p>  <blockquote>   <p><font face="Verdana">So, the senior defense policymakers of the two most significant military players in Europe think that the tiny portions of their tiny defense budgets       <br />going to NATO is mostly wasted?&#160; Now, perhaps having spent the last three years ensconced at a pro-NATO think tank has clouded my judgment but this strikes me as A1, above-the-fold, banner headline news.&#160;&#160; At very least, it deserves a sidebar or off-lede treatment of its own.&#160;&#160; But the average news        <br />consumer would surely have stopped well short of that point in the stories, once the writers started delving into the arcana of budgeting history.        <br /></font></p> </blockquote>  <p><font face="Verdana">What do you think? </font></p>  <p><font face="Verdana">Moreover, should this be big news at this time of the year? </font><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,715919,00.html"><font face="Verdana">"Terror Alert: Hamburg Islamist Speaks of Threat of Attacks in Germany"</font></a></p>  <blockquote>   <p><font face="Verdana">German officials are investigating apparent statements by a Hamburg Islamist recently arrested by US forces in Afghanistan about attack scenarios for terror strikes in Germany and neighboring countries. Ahmad S. is one of a number of Germany-based Islamists thought to have traveled to Pakistan and Afghanistan in 2009.       <br /></font></p> </blockquote>  <p><font face="Verdana">The biggest Germany related story in the Huffington Post is our new and young First Lady. Seven photo stories of </font><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/bettina-wulff"><font face="Verdana">Bettina Wulff</font></a><font face="Verdana"> within three weeks. OMG. I am disappointed by the Huffington Post, but I should have known better. Oh, and don't get me started on the media brouhaha for all these professional provocateurs like <a href="http://www.dialoginternational.com/dialog_international/2010/08/neonazi-npd-celebrates-thilo-serrazins-new-book.html">Thilo</a> <a href="http://www.dialoginternational.com/dialog_international/2010/09/thilo-sarrazins-american-fans.html">Sarazzin</a>, Geert Wilders, and Terry Jones, who are selling stuff.</font></p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1412-U.S.-Generals-Indicate-No-Quick-Withdrawal-from-Afghanistan.html" rel="alternate" title="U.S. Generals Indicate No Quick Withdrawal from Afghanistan" />
        <author>
            <name>Kyle Atwell</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-08-25T00:35:37Z</published>
        <updated>2010-08-31T22:20:05Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1412</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1412</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/3-Transatlantic-Relations" label="Transatlantic Relations" term="Transatlantic Relations" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1412-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">U.S. Generals Indicate No Quick Withdrawal from Afghanistan</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <font size="2" face="Verdana">Recent statements from top U.S. generals are dashing hopes in the US and among European Allies that the war in Afghanistan will wind down in the next year, despite President Obama's stated intentions to begin troop reductions in July 2011.<br /><br />Consider comments from the top U.S. Marine in Afghanistan, General James Conway, reported by <a href="http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010\08\25\story_25-8-2010_pg7_7">Daily Times</a>:<br /></font><blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana">In recent months, US officials have played down expectations of any large withdrawal of troops in July 2011. Conway echoed those sentiments, saying he believed Marines would remain in the south for years. He said that Afghan forces would not be ready to take over security from US troops in key southern provinces for at least a few years.<br /><br /><strong>&ldquo;I honestly think it will be a few years before conditions on the ground are such that turnover will be possible for us,&rdquo; he said, referring to Marines deployed in the provinces of Helmand and Kandahar. Conway said some Afghan units somewhere might be able to assume the lead for security in 2011 but not in the south. </strong><br /></font></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana">Further statements by General David Petraeus regarding the Afghanistan drawdown make it clear that the July 2011 date does not signal a hard end of the war, writes <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2010/08/mil-100823-rferl02.htm">GlobalSecurity.org</a>: <br /></font><blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana">Petraeus also repeated his view that the drawdown in U.S. and NATO forces, scheduled to begin in July 2011, will not result in a swift withdrawal.<br /><br /><strong>&quot;July 2011...is the date when a process begins. It is not the date when the U.S. forces begin an exodus and look for the exit and a light to turn out,&quot; Petraeus said. </strong><br /></font></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana">General Petraeus discusses the July 2011 drawdown in a video interview with the BBC, found <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11055296">here</a>.<br /><br />In the article &quot;Why Europe Fears </font><font size="2" face="Verdana">Petraeus</font><font size="2" face="Verdana">'s Urge to Surge&quot;, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5bcaa5a4-ae14-11df-bb55-00144feabdc0.html">Financial Times</a> argues that European leaders not only desire a more expedient withdrawal from Afghanistan, but also want to pursue a different strategy for ending the conflict based on negotiations with the Taliban:<br /></font><blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana"><strong>In discussions with European generals, diplomats and officials &ndash; each involved in their government&rsquo;s Afghan policy &ndash; a common fear emerges. That US president Barack Obama will not be able to refuse demands from Gen Petraeus to extend the surge well beyond July 2011; that the general will continue to push for a continuation of military strategy; and that he will decline any suggestion of opening negotiations with the Taliban &ndash; something that many Europeans are very keen on.</strong><br />...<br />European officials are coming to the consensus that they would like the Nato summit and Mr Obama&rsquo;s Afghan policy review &ndash; both at the end of the year &ndash; to reach a position where negotiating with the Taliban is the political strategy around which military strategy is determined.<br /><br />Troop withdrawals, which Mr Obama says will start next July, would then take place according to the pace of talks between the US, the Taliban and the Afghan government; not on the basis of hard-to-gauge battlefield success. Europe also wants the US to press Afghanistan&rsquo;s neighbours not to interfere in its affairs.<br /><br />Gen Petraeus wants to convince Washington, Nato and Europe to do just the opposite, determining withdrawals on the basis of the military, not the political, situation. <br /></font></blockquote> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alliance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Defense</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>NATO</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Obama</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Taliban</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>War</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1411-Superman-is-wearing-black,-red-and-gold-this-year.html" rel="alternate" title="&quot;Superman is wearing black, red and gold this year&quot;" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-08-13T17:46:32Z</published>
        <updated>2010-08-20T12:51:08Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1411</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1411</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/12-German-Politics" label="German Politics" term="German Politics" />
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/8-International-Economics" label="International Economics" term="International Economics" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1411-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">&quot;Superman is wearing black, red and gold this year&quot;</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/14/business/global/14euro.html?hp"><font face="Verdana"><img border="0" align="left" alt="" style="border: 0px none; margin: 10px 15px 10px 0px; display: inline;" src="http://atlanticreview.org/uploads/NYTGER.png"  /></font></a><font face="Verdana">When was the last time the New York Times front page featured a headline with the words &quot;German Surge&quot;? I bet never since WWII. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">Well, today's headline might only be at the top of the online edition and only for a few hours.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">The good economic news come as quiet a surprise on this side of the Atlantic as well. I got the impression that most folks here don't expect it too last. Thus, consumer spending is not likely to increase, and in consequence our neighbors and the US are likely to continue to complain about our &quot;selfish&quot; economic policy.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">Though the </font><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/14/business/global/14euro.html?hp"><font face="Verdana">NYT</font></a><font face="Verdana"> points out: &quot;German consumer spending, which tends to be tepid even in good times, contributed to the growth spurt, as the number of people working grew 0.2 percent from a year earlier to 40.3 million, the Federal Statistical Office said.&quot;      <br /></font></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-13/germany-s-superman-economy-expands-at-fastest-pace-since-reunification.html"><font face="Verdana">Bloomberg</font></a><font face="Verdana"> writes about record German growth (HT: David)</font></p>
<blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">The increase in German GDP was the strongest quarterly gain since records for the reunified country began in 1991. First- quarter growth was also revised to 0.5 percent from 0.2 percent. Euro-area GDP rose 0.2 percent in the first three months of the year. </font></p>
</blockquote> <br /><a href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1411-Superman-is-wearing-black,-red-and-gold-this-year.html#extended">Continue reading "&quot;Superman is wearing black, red and gold this year&quot;"</a>
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1409-Preventing-History-from-Repeating-Itself.html" rel="alternate" title="Preventing History from Repeating Itself" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-08-09T21:32:45Z</published>
        <updated>2010-08-10T22:51:00Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1409</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1409</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/12-German-Politics" label="German Politics" term="German Politics" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1409-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Preventing History from Repeating Itself</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,710845,00.html"><font face="Verdana">Spiegel International:</font></a><font face="Verdana"> </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">German police on Monday closed a mosque that had been a meeting place for the 9/11 terror cell. They believe the mosque continued to promote jihad and may have been a staging site for Islamist extremists living in Germany who have traveled to Afghanistan and Pakistan to participate in militant camps.</font></p>
</blockquote> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Al Qaeda</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pakistan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Terrorism</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1410-Iraq-War-Enhances-US-Image-as-a-Colonial-Power.html" rel="alternate" title="Iraq War Enhances US Image as a Colonial Power?" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-08-09T20:46:00Z</published>
        <updated>2010-08-10T22:39:18Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1410</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1410</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/2-US-Foreign-Policy" label="US Foreign Policy" term="US Foreign Policy" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1410-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Iraq War Enhances US Image as a Colonial Power?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">Joe Klein in </font><a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2008733,00.html"><font face="Verdana">Time Magazine</font></a><font face="Verdana">: </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">Our attempt to construct an Iraq more amenable to our interests will end no better than the previous attempts by Western colonial powers. Even if something resembling democracy prevails, the U.S. invasion and occupation will not be remembered fondly by Iraqis. We will own the destruction in perpetuity; if the Iraqis manage to cobble themselves a decent society, they will see it, correctly, as an achievement of their own. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">There are other consequences of this profound misadventure. The return of the Taliban in Afghanistan is certainly one. If U.S. attention hadn't been diverted from that primary conflict, the story in the Pashtun borderlands might be very different now. The sense of the U.S. as a repository of tempered, honorable actions may never recover from the images of the past decade, especially the photographs from Abu Ghraib prison. The idea that it was our right and responsibility to rid Iraq of a terrible dictator - after the original casus belli of weapons of mass destruction evaporated - turned out to be a neocolonialist delusion.&#160; </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">The US is now seen as a former colonial power just like France and Britain? Is a more positive legacy of the Iraq war imaginable?</font></p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Iraq</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1408-Thousands-of-Classified-Reports-on-the-Afghanistan-War-Leaked.html" rel="alternate" title="Thousands of Classified Reports on the Afghanistan War Leaked" />
        <author>
            <name>Kyle Atwell</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-07-26T00:34:06Z</published>
        <updated>2010-07-31T16:53:46Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1408</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1408</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/3-Transatlantic-Relations" label="Transatlantic Relations" term="Transatlantic Relations" />
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/2-US-Foreign-Policy" label="US Foreign Policy" term="US Foreign Policy" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1408-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Thousands of Classified Reports on the Afghanistan War Leaked</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <font size="2" face="Verdana">An extensive series of previously classified reports on the Afghanistan war effort titled the <a href="http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Afghan_War_Diary,_2004-2010">Afghan War Diary (AWD)</a> has been made public by the website WikiLeaks.&#160; <br /><br /></font><font size="2" face="Verdana">The <em>NYT</em>, <em>Guardian</em> and <em>Der Spiegel</em></font><font size="2" face="Verdana"> were leaked the reports several weeks ago.&#160; Each has spent the past month analyzing the reports and writing articles with their key deductions.&#160; According to the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/world/26editors-note.html">editors' note</a>:<br /></font><blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana">The articles published today are based on thousands of United States military incident and intelligence reports &mdash; records of engagements, mishaps, intelligence on enemy activity and other events from the war in Afghanistan &mdash; that were made public on Sunday on the Internet. The New York Times, The Guardian newspaper in London, and the German magazine Der Spiegel were given access to the material several weeks ago. These reports are used by desk officers in the Pentagon and troops in the field when they make operational plans and prepare briefings on the situation in the war zone. Most of the reports are routine, even mundane, but many add insights, texture and context to a war that has been waged for nearly nine years.</font><br /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana">The <em>NYT</em>, <em>Guardian</em> and <em>Der Spiegel</em> have all vetted the reports and come to the conclusion that the material is authentic.&#160; <br /><br />You can download the full set of reports from the WikiLeaks website, <a href="http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Afghan_War_Diary,_2004-2010">here</a>. <br /><br /><em>New York Times</em> coverage is found <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/war-logs.html?emc=na">here</a>.<br /><em>Guardian</em> coverage <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/25/afghanistan-war-logs-military-leaks">here</a>. <br /><em>Der Spiegel</em> coverage <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,708314,00.html">here</a>. <br /><br /></font> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alliance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Defense</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Military</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>NATO</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>War</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1407-Support-Our-Troops-The-German-Edition.html" rel="alternate" title="&quot;Support Our Troops&quot; - The German Edition" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-07-23T14:29:55Z</published>
        <updated>2010-07-30T09:50:31Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1407</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1407</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/12-German-Politics" label="German Politics" term="German Politics" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1407-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">&quot;Support Our Troops&quot; - The German Edition</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p>What is common in the United States, is rather rare in Germany: Expressing support of our soldiers in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>While most US critics of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan make extra efforts to distinguish between criticism of the strategy/purpose of the wars and the service of the troops, such differentiation usually is not made in Germany. I have never seen a car with the bumper sticker &quot;Support our Troops.&quot;</p>
<p>The Bundeswehr troops do not get much support from citizens, media, celebrities or politicians. Instead many soldiers are concerned about the opinion polls that indicate popular disapproval of the Afghanistan war. </p>
<p>Therefore the Atlantische Initiative (my day job) has teamed up with Germany's biggest daily newspaper and started the campaign <a href="http://www.atlantic-community.org/index/articles/view/Feldpost_f%FCr_unsere_Soldaten_">&quot;Feldpost f&uuml;r unsere Soldaten!&quot;</a>     <br />&#160;<a href="http://www.atlantic-community.org/index/articles/view/Feldpost_f%FCr_unsere_Soldaten_"><img border="0" src="http://www.atlantic-community.org/app/webroot/img/articleimg/feldpost.jpg" style="border-width: 0px;" alt=""  /></a>     <br />We encourage our readers and members to write short personal messages of support for the Bundeswehr troops. We will then forward the best ones to the various bases in Afghanistan. Several hundred messages have already been published by our partners at the tabloid <a href="http://www.bild.de/BILD/politik/2010/07/22/bild-de-aktion-bundeswehr-feldpost/unterartikel/umfrage.html">Bild</a>.</p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>AC</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bundeswehr</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Germany</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>NATO</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Think Tank</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1406-Anti-European-Schadenfreude-Rising.html" rel="alternate" title="Anti-European Schadenfreude Rising?" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-07-18T11:36:58Z</published>
        <updated>2010-07-25T00:02:54Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1406</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1406</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/3-Transatlantic-Relations" label="Transatlantic Relations" term="Transatlantic Relations" />
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/1-US-Domestic-and-Cultural-Issues" label="US Domestic and Cultural Issues" term="US Domestic and Cultural Issues" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1406-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Anti-European Schadenfreude Rising?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">When Foreign Policy featured an article on Anti-Europeanism in the United States as &quot;Today's FP&quot; cover, I got intrigued, but I was disappointed when I read </font><font face="Verdana">this article Guardian columnist Simon Tisdall</font><font face="Verdana">, which currently is FP's most read piece of the week. Old arguments about the Iraq war debate and last year's Obama trips to Europe. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">Here are the more interesting paragraphs regarding the reason for Anti-European attitudes:</font></p>
<blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">Fear, envy, anti-colonialism, anti-imperialism, cultural inferiority-superiority complexes, trade, political and military rivalries, and America's quest for identity all fed anti-European feeling as the new country sought to differentiate itself from the old countries whence most of its people came. Many of these phenomena remain relevant today. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">&quot;Expressing one's anti-European sentiment can be a way of building up and displaying one's American identity and patriotism,&quot; said Patrick Chamorel in a European University Institute study published in Italy in 2004. &quot;Anti-Europeanism has always been part of American exceptionalism, which defined itself in contrast to European history, politics, and society.&quot; </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">It would be easy for Europeans to shrug off America's Europhobic generalizations and mischaracterizations if they were exclusive to would-be-intellectual neoconservatives, Bible Belt evangelists, and provincial Midwest xenophobes. But ever since the European Union dropped the ball in the Balkans in the mid-1990s, a potent mix of influential American thinkers, policymakers, and commentators have given anti-Europeanism a new respectability that cannot be dismissed out of hand. On the major issues that preoccupy Americans -- defense, security, terrorism, intervention, free trade, sovereignty, and nationalism -- the argument that Europe has lost its way has gained in influence. And as a debt-laden European Union stares at the fiscal abyss, one can almost feel the schadenfreude emanating from across the pond. </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">&quot;Almost feel the schadenfreude emanating&quot;? Does it get any more vague than that? Read the FP article </font><a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/07/15/venus_envy"><font face="Verdana">Venus Envy</font></a><font face="Verdana"> and come back here to comment, if you like.</font></p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Anti-Europeanism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Europe</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Moral Values</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1404-Taliban-Recruit-Monkey-Terrorists.html" rel="alternate" title="Taliban Recruit Monkey Terrorists" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-07-13T21:55:00Z</published>
        <updated>2010-07-15T18:12:17Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1404</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1404</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/2-US-Foreign-Policy" label="US Foreign Policy" term="US Foreign Policy" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1404-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Taliban Recruit Monkey Terrorists</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">Oh, no. &quot;Taliban trains 'monkey terrorists' to attack U.S. troops,&quot; writes the </font><a href="http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/90851/7043384.html"><font face="Verdana">People's Daily</font></a><font face="Verdana"> from China (via <a href="http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/07/12/no_seriously_the_talibans_training_monkey_commandos">FP</a>):</font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="left"><font face="Verdana">Taliban forces have taught monkeys how to use the Kalashnikov, Bren light machine gun and trench mortars. They also teach them how to identify and attack soldiers wearing U.S. military uniforms. Ironically, the idea of training monkeys to fight was first invented by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="left"><font face="Verdana">Will NATO prevail against the monkeys? Is it April 1st in the Chinese calendar?</font></p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1405-Will-Soccer-Bring-an-End-to-American-Exceptionalism.html" rel="alternate" title="Will Soccer Bring an End to American Exceptionalism?" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-07-13T21:39:00Z</published>
        <updated>2010-07-20T21:32:53Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1405</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1405</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/3-Transatlantic-Relations" label="Transatlantic Relations" term="Transatlantic Relations" />
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/1-US-Domestic-and-Cultural-Issues" label="US Domestic and Cultural Issues" term="US Domestic and Cultural Issues" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1405-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Will Soccer Bring an End to American Exceptionalism?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">We discussed American exceptionalism during the 2006 world cup: </font><a href="../../../../archives/335-Soccer-in-German-American-Relations.html?s9y_c565e7f8ca512eb512f6052d71119ebf=6c94ae6c521c4565015d36e92e95dd32">Soccer  in German-American Relations</a> and <a href="../../../../archives/1303-Soccer-is-for-Losers.html?s9y_c565e7f8ca512eb512f6052d71119ebf=6c94ae6c521c4565015d36e92e95dd32">Soccer  is for Losers?</a></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">Soccer is getting increasingly popular in the US, which <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201006110040">some</a> <a href="http://www.sportsgrid.com/media/hating-soccer-conservative-conspirac/">conservative</a> <a href="http://pr.thinkprogress.org/2010/06/pr20100615/index.html/">Americans</a> don't like. Is America becoming less exceptional now? </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">Or is it the other way round: Americans need to feel less exceptional before soccer becomes more popular and they win the world cup? A Brazilian paper translated by </font><a href="http://watchingamerica.com/News/61127/the-persistent-enigma-ofamerican-football/"><font face="Verdana">Watching America</font></a><font face="Verdana"> concludes with such a pretty loaded question:</font></p>
<blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">If Americans are able to abandon the idea of being chosen by God to save the world, if these citizens are open to the fact that they are identical to all other human beings and therefore do not have a clear target or are not necessarily superior or virtuous, then could it be possible for America to someday soon join the rest of the species and celebrate the most beautiful sport of our time with the rest of the world? Or is it inconceivable that within a few decades, this country could finally win the World Cup?</font></p>
</blockquote> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Soccer</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1403-Lets-Cut-Defense-Spending.html" rel="alternate" title="&quot;Let's Cut Defense Spending&quot;" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-07-11T11:57:58Z</published>
        <updated>2010-07-15T20:08:36Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1403</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1403</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/3-Transatlantic-Relations" label="Transatlantic Relations" term="Transatlantic Relations" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1403-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">&quot;Let's Cut Defense Spending&quot;</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">Strange world: Atlantic Review is not just as </font><a href="http://atlanticreview.org/archives/1402-Atlantic-Review-Used-for-MA-Thesis.html"><font face="Verdana">a reference in an MA thesis</font></a><font face="Verdana">, but is also referenced by E.D. Kain of the neoconservative (?) National Review Online to make the argument that </font><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=MGMxMGE0ZmE2YTE5YmUzZWU1OTBhNmFkMWFlNDE5NjM="><font face="Verdana">the US should cut defense spending</font></a><font face="Verdana">. He is linking to our blog in this paragraph: </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">Americans provide defense for Europe and much of Asia, allowing Europeans </font><a href="http://atlanticreview.org/archives/266-Defense-budget-US-spends-too-much-and-Europe-spends-too-little.html"><font face="Verdana">to spend almost nothing on defense</font></a><font face="Verdana"> while spending lavish amounts on generous entitlement programs. And it is not at all clear that these countries actually want our military bases anymore. Europe has largely put war behind it with the advent of the European Union, and save for the Korean peninsula, Asia is largely moving toward a peaceful, global economy as well. Refocusing our defense priorities into regions that have more direct implications for our own national security, such as Africa and the Middle East, would force Europe to take into account not only the defense of its own soil, but the vast expense associated with that defense. Governments already burdened with extraordinarily high rates of taxation will be forced to make cuts in their welfare programs in order to shore up their defense apparatus. </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana">I disagree. I bet that Germany will not increase defense spending, if the US closes another military base. Previous closures did not lead to increase either. Many Americans like to think that US military bases abroad are protecting the host countries, while majorities (?) in the host countries see the bases as serving primarily US interests.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">Whatever the US does, German defense spending declines for domestic reasons. Last week, the German legislative even voted to shorten military service down to six months for budgetary reasons. To me that sounds more like a military internship than part of national defense. Quite a few politicians want to maintain the military service since it supports recruitment for professional soldiers. In the 60s and early 70s the military service was three times as long as it is today.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">An interesting statistic that the National Review Online author did not get from us: &quot;Each troop we send to Afghanistan costs the public $1 million per year. That's $1 million siphoned out of the U.S. economy and shipped overseas to the mountains of Afghanistan and the Iraqi deserts.&quot; Aha! Since this is the National Review I am tempted to ask the author whether the economy is more important than security? They seem to be moving towards the European position on war versus economy. Is America becoming a post-heroic society just like Europe, this was actually the topic of the blogpost to be </font><a href="http://atlanticreview.org/archives/1402-Atlantic-Review-Used-for-MA-Thesis.html"><font face="Verdana">referenced in an MA thesis</font></a><font face="Verdana">.</font></p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Defense</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Military</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1402-Atlantic-Review-Used-for-MA-Thesis.html" rel="alternate" title="Atlantic Review Used for MA Thesis" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-07-11T11:31:15Z</published>
        <updated>2010-07-11T11:32:20Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1402</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1402</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/14-European-Issues" label="European Issues" term="European Issues" />
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/1-US-Domestic-and-Cultural-Issues" label="US Domestic and Cultural Issues" term="US Domestic and Cultural Issues" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1402-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Atlantic Review Used for MA Thesis</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">An Irish student emailed me that he his going to reference an Atlantic Review blogpost in his MA thesis: </font><a href="http://atlanticreview.org/archives/913-Are-Americans-More-Willing-to-Make-Sacrifices-Than-Europeans.html"><font face="Verdana">Are Americans More Willing to Make Sacrifices Than Europeans?</font></a></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">It was one of my better blogposts, written in 2007, but still up-to-date. I was discussing transatlantic attitudes towards war and sacrifice and concluded that Americans are more optimistic than Europeans and that Americans are moving towards a post-heroic society, in which Europeans already live.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">On the one hand, I am honored that this blog post will be referenced in an MA thesis, even though the reason might just be that I was discussing an issue with the prefix &quot;post.&quot; Academia loves terms like post-constructivism, post-Cold War era, and now post-heroic. On the other hand, I am not sure, if it is a good sign for academia if blogposts are used as references. Next, someone will use a tweet to argue that the Pope is Catholic. </font></p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Academia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hero</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Military</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>War</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1401-Two-Gitmo-Guys-Go-to-Germany.html" rel="alternate" title="Two Gitmo Guys Go to Germany" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-07-07T20:56:20Z</published>
        <updated>2010-07-08T12:35:16Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1401</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1401</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/12-German-Politics" label="German Politics" term="German Politics" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1401-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Two Gitmo Guys Go to Germany</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">The German government agreed to resettle a Syrian and a Palestinian Guantanamo detainee. </font><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jTF-7iPBkbKj3377UWAmpoH82D6g"><font face="Verdana">AP</font></a><font face="Verdana"> quotes a State Department spokesman saying: &quot;We greatly appreciate Germany's decision to resettle these two detainees.&quot; I think it is too little too late to really to impress Obama. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">ENDNOTE: The German soccer team attacked the Spain too little too late as well in today's semi-final. That damn octopus Paul was right again in predicting the </font><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/soccerinsider/2010/07/spain_vs_germany_the_continuin.html"><font face="Verdana">winner</font></a><font face="Verdana">. Congrats to Nanne for the Dutch victory over Uruguay. I will certainly cheer the Dutch team in the upcoming final.</font></p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Guantanamo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Soccer</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1400-Whats-Worse-Debt-or-Frugality.html" rel="alternate" title="What's Worse? Debt or Frugality?" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-06-30T05:59:20Z</published>
        <updated>2010-06-30T10:48:20Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1400</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1400</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/8-International-Economics" label="International Economics" term="International Economics" />
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/3-Transatlantic-Relations" label="Transatlantic Relations" term="Transatlantic Relations" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1400-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">What's Worse? Debt or Frugality?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&quot;Bashing Germany is the new favorite sport for policy makers and economists who want a more balanced world economy,&quot; writes </font><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704569204575329002035417196.html"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The Wall Street Journal</font></a><font face="Verdana"> and points out: &quot;That Germany's economy is unbalanced is clear. Household incomes and consumer spending have stagnated for a decade, and economic growth has come almost entirely from exports and related investment. Consumption is set to drop 1.4% this year, even though the overall economy will grow 1.9%.&quot;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The WSJ explains the German position very well, even though it does not quite agree with it:</font></p>
<blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">German Chancellor Angela Merkel argued in an interview last week that balancing the budget could even unlock consumers' wallets-whereas deficit spending might only lead to even-higher household saving. Germans save because they are worried the public pension and health-care systems will run out of money, and would save less if they had confidence in sustainable public finances, she argued. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Ms. Merkel's first term doesn't offer good evidence for that view, however. Germany cut its budget deficit from 4% in 2005, when she took office, to nil in 2008, before the financial crisis struck. In that time, Germans' household savings rate rose rather than fell-to 11.2% of disposable income, from 10.5%. The core problem is lack of growth in Germans' disposable income, not high savings rates which are largely justified for an aging population, say most economists. </font></p>
</blockquote> <font size="2"><font face="Verdana"><strong>Endnote:</strong> Does Obama </font></font><a href="http://atlanticreview.org/archives/1380-Germany-as-Maya-the-Bee.html"><font face="Verdana" size="2">sound French</font></a><font face="Verdana" size="2">, when he says that he is &quot;concerned by weak private-sector demand and continued reliance on exports by some countries with already large external surpluses.&quot;? He was clearly asking Germans to buy more American stuff. (Hey, nearly everyone is walking around with iPhones and the city is full with huge iPad advertisements. Or are that Chinese products?)</font>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Finance Minister Sch&auml;uble hits back at Obama by saying: &quot;Governments should not become </font><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,702849,00.html"><font face="Verdana" size="2">addicted to borrowing</font></a><font face="Verdana" size="2"> as a quick fix to stimulate demand. Deficit spending cannot become a permanent state of affairs.&quot; Oooch. I think most Germans agree. According to polls a majority of Germans are even against tax cuts. Can you believe it?</font></p> 
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Crisis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Germany</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Obama</dc:subject>

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1399-US,-France-and-Germany-Divisions-and-Lack-of-Professionalism-Everywhere.html" rel="alternate" title="US, France and Germany: Divisions and Lack of Professionalism Everywhere" />
        <author>
            <name>Joerg Wolf</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2010-06-23T22:50:08Z</published>
        <updated>2010-06-30T18:48:38Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.atlanticreview.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1399</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atlanticreview.org/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1399</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/12-German-Politics" label="German Politics" term="German Politics" />
            <category scheme="http://www.atlanticreview.org/categories/2-US-Foreign-Policy" label="US Foreign Policy" term="US Foreign Policy" />
    
        <id>http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1399-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">US, France and Germany: Divisions and Lack of Professionalism Everywhere</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.atlanticreview.org/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <p><font face="Verdana">We all need more team spirit. Obama's Afghanistan team is in disarray. Their egos seem to be as bloated as the ego's in the French soccer team. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">While President Obama is angry with </font><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/us/politics/24mcchrystal.html?hp"><font face="Verdana">McChrystal's</font></a><font face="Verdana"> frank comments and perhaps insubordination, President Sarkozy is </font><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/23/sarkozy-henry-meeting-world-cup-fiasco"><font face="Verdana">reportedly</font></a><font face="Verdana"> furious over the national team's behaviour inside and outside the soccer stadiums. It was not really a &quot;team.&quot; He even cleared his schedule for a one hour meeting with the captain on the day of a general labor strike. That shows how important the soccer team is for France as a symbol of national integration and unity. </font></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/worldcup2010/3026341/Ghana-0-Germany-1.html"><font face="Verdana"><img width="233" height="284" align="left" src="http://atlanticreview.org/uploads/sun.png" style="margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px; display: inline;" alt=""  /></font></a><font face="Verdana">Germany's coalition government has been in </font><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/14/angela-merkel-germany-coalition-collapse"><font face="Verdana">disarray</font></a><font face="Verdana"> for months as well with some calling each other &quot;wild pigs&quot; and &quot;gherkin troops&quot; (rank amateurs). (There are also rumors that one cabinet member called the defense minister &quot;rumpelstiltskin.&quot;) Though, thanks to the national soccer team's victory over Ghana today, Merkel's government won't collapse yet. ;-) <br /></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">If Germany had failed to make it into the round of sixteen for the first time in history, it would have been a national fiasco. Let's do not forget that the German coach is not called &quot;Trainer der Nationalmannschaft,&quot; but goes by the official sounding name &quot;Bundestrainer,&quot; just like the top government titles &quot;Bundeskanzler,&quot; &quot;Bundespr&auml;sident&quot; etc.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">On Sunday, we will play against England. One British fan said on TV that the world cup was invented for England and Germany to play against each other. Good point. Still, it is regrettable (but not at all surprising) that the British tabloid </font><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/worldcup2010/3026341/Ghana-0-Germany-1.html"><font face="Verdana">The Sun</font></a><font face="Verdana"> uses military language to describe the upcoming match. Come on, guys. It's just soccer. The real war is in Afghanistan.</font><br /></p> <br /><a href="http://www.atlanticreview.org/archives/1399-US,-France-and-Germany-Divisions-and-Lack-of-Professionalism-Everywhere.html#extended">Continue reading "US, France and Germany: Divisions and Lack of Professionalism Everywhere"</a>
            </div>
        </content>
        <dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>France</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Germany</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Merkel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Military</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Obama</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oil and Gas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Soccer</dc:subject>

    </entry>

</feed>