Posted by Kyle Atwell in
Transatlantic Relations on Saturday, November 22. 2008
Georgetown professor Charles King argues the United States needs to hold Georgia accountable for its role in last August's conflict with Russia (Foreign Policy):
The Russian military response was precipitous and brazen, and has rightly been condemned by outside powers, but the next U.S. administration must learn that brinkmanship is a game that countries can play with friends as well as adversaries. U.S. officials warned Tbilisi of the dangers of using military force, but Saakashvili escalated his rhetoric anyway and took advantage of Western statements that Georgia’s path toward consolidated democracy and NATO membership were guaranteed. A history of mixed messages coming from the United States contributed to the Georgian government’s sense that a quick, successful war would meet with U.S. approval.
Following the Russian invasion, NATO halted diplomatic work in the Russia-NATO Council. However, new chatter from NATO Headquarters suggests the Alliance will relaunch high-level diplomatic relations with Russia soon, reported by Moscow News Weekly:
In an indication that dialogue is possible, an alliance spokesman said earlier on Tuesday that the foreign ministers of 26 NATO member countries may decide to resume the work of the Russia-NATO Council at their meeting in early December.
However, NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said the alliance would support efforts by former communist nations to join the military alliance regardless of opposition from Russia. He added that NATO was not prepared to sacrifice the alliance's enlargement for good relations with Russia.
The EU already began rapprochement with Russia earlier this month relaunching negotiations over a new EU-Russia partnership treaty despite objections from some Eastern European member states that Russia has not fully met its obligations to withdraw from Georgian territory.
Are NATO and the EU capitulating, or simply approaching Russia relations with a practical working approach?
With regards to NATO, completely severing ties will likely get it nowhere with an intransigent Russia, and may even hurt NATO allies who depend on Russia for things like allowing supply trains through Russian territory to support troops in Afghanistan. Instead, maintaining diplomatic relations without sacrificing NATO's enlargement agenda will be a pragmatic move forward for the Alliance.
Welcome! You are reading the ATLANTIC REVIEW -- a Press Digest on Transatlantic Relations combined with commentary and analysis by three young professionals from Germany, the Netherlands and the United States. More about us.
The horizontal menu bar at the top helps to navigate this site.
Subscribe to one of our RSS-Feeds or to our newsletter, which is emailed twice per month.
Only registered users may post comments here. Get your own account
here and then
log into this blog. Your browser must support cookies.
The author does not allow comments to this entry